1. //
  2. Start
  3. //
  4. Publikationen
  5. Conservatives are less accurate than lib...
  6. Formate
  7. //

Conservatives are less accurate than liberals at recognizing false climate statements, and disinformation makes conservatives less discerning: Evidence from 12 countries

Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet

Standard

Conservatives are less accurate than liberals at recognizing false climate statements, and disinformation makes conservatives less discerning: Evidence from 12 countries. / Spampatti, Tobia; Hahnel, Ulf J.J.; Brosch, Tobias.
in: Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review, Jahrgang 5, Nr. 5, 17.10.2024.

Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet

Harvard

Spampatti, T, Hahnel, UJJ & Brosch, T 2024, 'Conservatives are less accurate than liberals at recognizing false climate statements, and disinformation makes conservatives less discerning: Evidence from 12 countries', Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review, Jg. 5, Nr. 5. https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-160

APA

Spampatti, T., Hahnel, U. J. J., & Brosch, T. (2024). Conservatives are less accurate than liberals at recognizing false climate statements, and disinformation makes conservatives less discerning: Evidence from 12 countries. Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review, 5(5). https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-160

Vancouver

Spampatti T, Hahnel UJJ, Brosch T. Conservatives are less accurate than liberals at recognizing false climate statements, and disinformation makes conservatives less discerning: Evidence from 12 countries. Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review. 2024 Okt 17;5(5). doi: 10.37016/mr-2020-160

Bibtex

@article{d80d662925e54d458c43148cf6d9d895,
title = "Conservatives are less accurate than liberals at recognizing false climate statements, and disinformation makes conservatives less discerning: Evidence from 12 countries",
abstract = "Competing hypotheses exist on how conservative political ideology is associated with susceptibility to misinformation. We performed a secondary analysis of responses from 1,721 participants from twelve countries in a study that investigated the effects of climate disinformation and six psychological interventions to protect participants against such disinformation. Participants were randomized to receiving twenty real climate disinformation statements or to a passive control condition. All participants then evaluated a separate set of true and false climate-related statements in support of or aiming to delay climate action in a truth discernment task. We found that conservative political ideology is selectively associated with increased misidentification of false statements aiming to delay climate action as true. These findings can be explained as a combination of expressive responding, partisanship bias, and motivated reasoning.",
keywords = "Management studies, Sustainability sciences, Management & Economics",
author = "Tobia Spampatti and Hahnel, {Ulf J.J.} and Tobias Brosch",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2024, Harvard Kennedy School. All rights reserved.",
year = "2024",
month = oct,
day = "17",
doi = "10.37016/mr-2020-160",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
journal = "Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review",
issn = "2766-1652",
publisher = "Harvard Kennedy School",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Conservatives are less accurate than liberals at recognizing false climate statements, and disinformation makes conservatives less discerning

T2 - Evidence from 12 countries

AU - Spampatti, Tobia

AU - Hahnel, Ulf J.J.

AU - Brosch, Tobias

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2024, Harvard Kennedy School. All rights reserved.

PY - 2024/10/17

Y1 - 2024/10/17

N2 - Competing hypotheses exist on how conservative political ideology is associated with susceptibility to misinformation. We performed a secondary analysis of responses from 1,721 participants from twelve countries in a study that investigated the effects of climate disinformation and six psychological interventions to protect participants against such disinformation. Participants were randomized to receiving twenty real climate disinformation statements or to a passive control condition. All participants then evaluated a separate set of true and false climate-related statements in support of or aiming to delay climate action in a truth discernment task. We found that conservative political ideology is selectively associated with increased misidentification of false statements aiming to delay climate action as true. These findings can be explained as a combination of expressive responding, partisanship bias, and motivated reasoning.

AB - Competing hypotheses exist on how conservative political ideology is associated with susceptibility to misinformation. We performed a secondary analysis of responses from 1,721 participants from twelve countries in a study that investigated the effects of climate disinformation and six psychological interventions to protect participants against such disinformation. Participants were randomized to receiving twenty real climate disinformation statements or to a passive control condition. All participants then evaluated a separate set of true and false climate-related statements in support of or aiming to delay climate action in a truth discernment task. We found that conservative political ideology is selectively associated with increased misidentification of false statements aiming to delay climate action as true. These findings can be explained as a combination of expressive responding, partisanship bias, and motivated reasoning.

KW - Management studies

KW - Sustainability sciences, Management & Economics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85207845983&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.37016/mr-2020-160

DO - 10.37016/mr-2020-160

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:85207845983

VL - 5

JO - Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review

JF - Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review

SN - 2766-1652

IS - 5

ER -

DOI