‘Chains of leverage’ as way to identify and foster transformative potential

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

‘Chains of leverage’ as way to identify and foster transformative potential. / Riechers, Maraja; Schaal-Lagodzinski, Tamara; Pereira, Laura et al.
in: People and Nature, 2025.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{3e258c6e40f34821a7be180b4d66f8f3,
title = "{\textquoteleft}Chains of leverage{\textquoteright} as way to identify and foster transformative potential",
abstract = "We propose the framework of {\textquoteleft}chains of leverage{\textquoteright}. It is an operationalisation to understand and analyse the transformative potential of social-ecological systems and identify leverage points for sustainability transformations through a concrete four-step approach. Step 1: Analysing the social-ecological system regarding its core elements across system depth. Elements in a system can be situated at different system depths (from shallow to deep) relating to system parameters, feedbacks, designs and intents. Step 2: Highlighting interactions and relationships between these elements across system depth; identifying if the relationship between elements can be categorised as dominant or alternative (suppressed), and if these elements are in contrast with each other; scrutinising the system for destructive elements or events. Step 3: Linking elements to ascertain if there are (coherent) chains of leverage. We define a {\textquoteleft}chain of leverage{\textquoteright} as a situation within a system in which multiple elements across system depths and governance levels have synergistic impact on each other. This step assesses how one type of change in a system might precipitate further changes across different system depths. Hence, we may find sequences of how shallow, mid-level and deep system elements flow on from and reinforce one another, creating a chain of leverage, which may be in conflict with an alternative chain of leverage. Step 4: Identifying leverage points to intervene either to (i) create a coherent chain of leverage that fosters sustainability, (ii) strengthen a currently weak element or chain that fosters sustainability, (iii) deconstruct or disempower existing, unsustainable elements or chains and (iv) eliminate or weaken disruptive elements that can negatively influence the sustainability of the system. Many systems are locked in unsustainable states, and we have yet to find ways to shift onto pathways for sustainability. The framework of chains of leverage can facilitate such a shift through helping to understand a system's transformative potential and to identify a coherent set of leverage points for sustainability transformation. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.",
keywords = "SDGs, social-ecological systems, sustainability management, transformative change, transition, visions, Environmental planning, Environmental Governance",
author = "Maraja Riechers and Tamara Schaal-Lagodzinski and Laura Pereira and Jacqueline Loos and Joern Fischer",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2025 The Author(s). People and Nature published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Ecological Society.",
year = "2025",
doi = "10.1002/pan3.70144",
language = "English",
journal = "People and Nature",
issn = "2575-8314",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd.",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - ‘Chains of leverage’ as way to identify and foster transformative potential

AU - Riechers, Maraja

AU - Schaal-Lagodzinski, Tamara

AU - Pereira, Laura

AU - Loos, Jacqueline

AU - Fischer, Joern

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2025 The Author(s). People and Nature published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Ecological Society.

PY - 2025

Y1 - 2025

N2 - We propose the framework of ‘chains of leverage’. It is an operationalisation to understand and analyse the transformative potential of social-ecological systems and identify leverage points for sustainability transformations through a concrete four-step approach. Step 1: Analysing the social-ecological system regarding its core elements across system depth. Elements in a system can be situated at different system depths (from shallow to deep) relating to system parameters, feedbacks, designs and intents. Step 2: Highlighting interactions and relationships between these elements across system depth; identifying if the relationship between elements can be categorised as dominant or alternative (suppressed), and if these elements are in contrast with each other; scrutinising the system for destructive elements or events. Step 3: Linking elements to ascertain if there are (coherent) chains of leverage. We define a ‘chain of leverage’ as a situation within a system in which multiple elements across system depths and governance levels have synergistic impact on each other. This step assesses how one type of change in a system might precipitate further changes across different system depths. Hence, we may find sequences of how shallow, mid-level and deep system elements flow on from and reinforce one another, creating a chain of leverage, which may be in conflict with an alternative chain of leverage. Step 4: Identifying leverage points to intervene either to (i) create a coherent chain of leverage that fosters sustainability, (ii) strengthen a currently weak element or chain that fosters sustainability, (iii) deconstruct or disempower existing, unsustainable elements or chains and (iv) eliminate or weaken disruptive elements that can negatively influence the sustainability of the system. Many systems are locked in unsustainable states, and we have yet to find ways to shift onto pathways for sustainability. The framework of chains of leverage can facilitate such a shift through helping to understand a system's transformative potential and to identify a coherent set of leverage points for sustainability transformation. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

AB - We propose the framework of ‘chains of leverage’. It is an operationalisation to understand and analyse the transformative potential of social-ecological systems and identify leverage points for sustainability transformations through a concrete four-step approach. Step 1: Analysing the social-ecological system regarding its core elements across system depth. Elements in a system can be situated at different system depths (from shallow to deep) relating to system parameters, feedbacks, designs and intents. Step 2: Highlighting interactions and relationships between these elements across system depth; identifying if the relationship between elements can be categorised as dominant or alternative (suppressed), and if these elements are in contrast with each other; scrutinising the system for destructive elements or events. Step 3: Linking elements to ascertain if there are (coherent) chains of leverage. We define a ‘chain of leverage’ as a situation within a system in which multiple elements across system depths and governance levels have synergistic impact on each other. This step assesses how one type of change in a system might precipitate further changes across different system depths. Hence, we may find sequences of how shallow, mid-level and deep system elements flow on from and reinforce one another, creating a chain of leverage, which may be in conflict with an alternative chain of leverage. Step 4: Identifying leverage points to intervene either to (i) create a coherent chain of leverage that fosters sustainability, (ii) strengthen a currently weak element or chain that fosters sustainability, (iii) deconstruct or disempower existing, unsustainable elements or chains and (iv) eliminate or weaken disruptive elements that can negatively influence the sustainability of the system. Many systems are locked in unsustainable states, and we have yet to find ways to shift onto pathways for sustainability. The framework of chains of leverage can facilitate such a shift through helping to understand a system's transformative potential and to identify a coherent set of leverage points for sustainability transformation. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

KW - SDGs

KW - social-ecological systems

KW - sustainability management

KW - transformative change

KW - transition

KW - visions

KW - Environmental planning

KW - Environmental Governance

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105016210526&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/pan3.70144

DO - 10.1002/pan3.70144

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:105016210526

JO - People and Nature

JF - People and Nature

SN - 2575-8314

ER -

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Forschende

  1. Wiebke Keller

Publikationen

  1. CSR
  2. Management of 'technology push' development projects
  3. The common European framework of reference for languages
  4. Mechanical characterisation and modelling of electrospun materials for biomedical applications
  5. Abjection and Formlessness
  6. Hub, Fine-Tuner oder Business as Usual?
  7. Barriers to user-innovation
  8. Insights into an Action-Oriented Training Program to Promote Sustainable Entrepreneurship
  9. Toward a better understanding of corporate accelerator models
  10. Diversity and specificity of host-natural enemy interactions in an urban-rural interface
  11. What’s Hot: Machine Learning for the Quantified Self
  12. Making the Neocolonial Present Strange Again
  13. A comparison of current practices in German manufacturing industries
  14. Three-Dimensional Measurement Through the Calibration of a Laser Profilometer
  15. Diffusion of tax policies in the European Union
  16. Higher wages in exporting firms: self-selection, export effect, or both?
  17. machine/readable. Reflextions upon the ›knowledge‹ of images
  18. User-innovation
  19. Práticas integrativas e complementares no sistema único de saúde do brasil
  20. Glue Embolization of Gastroesophageal Varices during Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt (TIPS) Improves Survival Compared to Coil-only Embolization—A Single-Center Retrospective Study
  21. Comparison of proton and neutron cascades generated by proton beams in air, CO2, and CH4 environments
  22. Global innovation
  23. THE INTERNAL STRUCTURE OF THE CHEMISTRY FIELD IN BRAZIL.
  24. Past – Present – Progressive
  25. Guest Editorial
  26. Validation of the Later Life Workplace Index (LLWI) across 17 countries
  27. Experimental evidence on adoption bias and legitimacy strategies for pure user innovations
  28. Das umstrittene Erbe von 1989
  29. How to use analogies for breakthrough innovations
  30. Investigating Learning Assistance by Demonstration for Robotic Wheelchairs
  31. Beyond motives to adopt
  32. Gender diversity in academic publishing—comment on Galak and Kahn (2021)
  33. From a Multicultural to Multinatural Science Education
  34. Xtreme design
  35. The influence of circular economy implementation on competitiveness in manufacturing companies
  36. Virtual Reality Elterngesprächstraining
  37. Politische Instrumentalisierung von DDR-Geschichte
  38. No innovation for the elderly? The influence of cognitive distance in corporate innovation
  39. Refugee
  40. Responsiv-transformative Weltbeziehungen – Resonanz als Anspruch einer nachhaltigkeitsbezogenen Bildung
  41. Opportunities of frugality in the post-corona era
  42. Jugendhilfe - und dann?
  43. „Aber manchmal habe ich schon diese Angst …“
  44. Lead markets, international business and frugal innovation