“Caught in the Middle! Wealth Inequality and Conflict over Redistribution”

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

“Caught in the Middle! Wealth Inequality and Conflict over Redistribution”. / Lierse, Hanna; Lascombes, Davy Kim; Becker, Bastian.
in: Social Justice Research, Jahrgang 35, Nr. 4, 01.12.2022, S. 436-461.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Lierse H, Lascombes DK, Becker B. “Caught in the Middle! Wealth Inequality and Conflict over Redistribution”. Social Justice Research. 2022 Dez 1;35(4):436-461. doi: 10.1007/s11211-021-00384-x

Bibtex

@article{1de71e09914b4b2092123ac4f1f60796,
title = "“Caught in the Middle! Wealth Inequality and Conflict over Redistribution”",
abstract = "A vast literature documents that wealth inequality has risen throughout advanced democracies, especially the accumulation of wealth among the rich. Yet, instead of increasing wealth redistribution, governments have done the seemingly opposite. Key to understanding why democratic governments do not increase wealth redistribution in times of rising inequalities is to shed light on the public{\textquoteright}s preferences. In this paper, we map the public{\textquoteright}s redistributive preferences in fourteen countries based on new survey data. We show that traditional socioeconomic cleavages in preferences for wealth redistribution are undermined by diverging mobility expectations. People who expect to climb up the wealth distribution, mostly lower wealth groups, are less supportive of redistribution than people with high stakes of major wealth losses, mainly upper wealth groups. We show that future expectations among the rich and the poor have a highly moderating role for the class conflict over wealth redistribution. Moreover, the middle class, the decisive group in democracies, is highly unresponsive to future prospects. The findings suggest that the middle class does not have much to lose or to win, and therefore, wealth redistribution is of low salience among this group.",
keywords = "Mobility, Redistributive preferences, Social classes, Wealth inequality, Sustainability sciences, Management & Economics",
author = "Hanna Lierse and Lascombes, {Davy Kim} and Bastian Becker",
year = "2022",
month = dec,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11211-021-00384-x",
language = "English",
volume = "35",
pages = "436--461",
journal = "Social Justice Research",
issn = "0885-7466",
publisher = "Springer New York LLC",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - “Caught in the Middle! Wealth Inequality and Conflict over Redistribution”

AU - Lierse, Hanna

AU - Lascombes, Davy Kim

AU - Becker, Bastian

PY - 2022/12/1

Y1 - 2022/12/1

N2 - A vast literature documents that wealth inequality has risen throughout advanced democracies, especially the accumulation of wealth among the rich. Yet, instead of increasing wealth redistribution, governments have done the seemingly opposite. Key to understanding why democratic governments do not increase wealth redistribution in times of rising inequalities is to shed light on the public’s preferences. In this paper, we map the public’s redistributive preferences in fourteen countries based on new survey data. We show that traditional socioeconomic cleavages in preferences for wealth redistribution are undermined by diverging mobility expectations. People who expect to climb up the wealth distribution, mostly lower wealth groups, are less supportive of redistribution than people with high stakes of major wealth losses, mainly upper wealth groups. We show that future expectations among the rich and the poor have a highly moderating role for the class conflict over wealth redistribution. Moreover, the middle class, the decisive group in democracies, is highly unresponsive to future prospects. The findings suggest that the middle class does not have much to lose or to win, and therefore, wealth redistribution is of low salience among this group.

AB - A vast literature documents that wealth inequality has risen throughout advanced democracies, especially the accumulation of wealth among the rich. Yet, instead of increasing wealth redistribution, governments have done the seemingly opposite. Key to understanding why democratic governments do not increase wealth redistribution in times of rising inequalities is to shed light on the public’s preferences. In this paper, we map the public’s redistributive preferences in fourteen countries based on new survey data. We show that traditional socioeconomic cleavages in preferences for wealth redistribution are undermined by diverging mobility expectations. People who expect to climb up the wealth distribution, mostly lower wealth groups, are less supportive of redistribution than people with high stakes of major wealth losses, mainly upper wealth groups. We show that future expectations among the rich and the poor have a highly moderating role for the class conflict over wealth redistribution. Moreover, the middle class, the decisive group in democracies, is highly unresponsive to future prospects. The findings suggest that the middle class does not have much to lose or to win, and therefore, wealth redistribution is of low salience among this group.

KW - Mobility

KW - Redistributive preferences

KW - Social classes

KW - Wealth inequality

KW - Sustainability sciences, Management & Economics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85123834235&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/e70246d5-0b4a-364a-8f93-bd991c9f3495/

U2 - 10.1007/s11211-021-00384-x

DO - 10.1007/s11211-021-00384-x

M3 - Journal articles

C2 - 36406820

AN - SCOPUS:85123834235

VL - 35

SP - 436

EP - 461

JO - Social Justice Research

JF - Social Justice Research

SN - 0885-7466

IS - 4

ER -

DOI