Archival research on integrated reporting: a systematic review of main drivers and the impact of integrated reporting on firm value
Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Übersichtsarbeiten › Forschung
Standard
in: Journal of Management and Governance, Jahrgang 26, Nr. 3, 01.09.2022, S. 997-1061.
Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Übersichtsarbeiten › Forschung
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Archival research on integrated reporting
T2 - a systematic review of main drivers and the impact of integrated reporting on firm value
AU - Velte, Patrick
PY - 2022/9/1
Y1 - 2022/9/1
N2 - Integrated reporting (IR) represents an innovative approach to business reporting especially by Public Interest Entities (PIEs). In addition to financial capital, the integrated report includes material information about manufactured, intellectual, human, social and relational, and natural capitals. Although there has been a steady growth in empirical IR research, there is—as yet—no literature review on the business case for IR. Thus, the purpose of this study is to convey a detailed understanding of the governance-, (non) financial performance-, and reporting-related determinants of IR and its contribution to firm value in line with the business case argument. To do so, we selected 85 quantitative peer-reviewed archival studies on that topic. We have then differentiated said studies between those that focus on IR adoption versus those that focus on IR quality, with a legitimacy- and stakeholder-theory-based framework. This differentiation is crucial, to stress the challenges of greenwashing policies and information overload. Here, in contrast to former literature reviews on IR, we provide new insights into this emerging research topic and concentrate on archival IR research. We are also interested in recent moderator- and mediator analysis in archival IR research since the business case argument for IR may require a specific environment, in addition to the main variables we have included. We likewise give a detailed overview of included variables and proxies and compare their main statistical effects. Our literature review demonstrates that (1) board composition and (2) stakeholder pressure positively influence IR quality; whereas (3) (non) financial performance leads to increased IR adoption and quality. We also find that both IR adoption and IR quality are linked with positive consequences on firm valuation, as they lead to higher total performance measures. Last but not least, this analysis includes useful recommendations for future IR research.
AB - Integrated reporting (IR) represents an innovative approach to business reporting especially by Public Interest Entities (PIEs). In addition to financial capital, the integrated report includes material information about manufactured, intellectual, human, social and relational, and natural capitals. Although there has been a steady growth in empirical IR research, there is—as yet—no literature review on the business case for IR. Thus, the purpose of this study is to convey a detailed understanding of the governance-, (non) financial performance-, and reporting-related determinants of IR and its contribution to firm value in line with the business case argument. To do so, we selected 85 quantitative peer-reviewed archival studies on that topic. We have then differentiated said studies between those that focus on IR adoption versus those that focus on IR quality, with a legitimacy- and stakeholder-theory-based framework. This differentiation is crucial, to stress the challenges of greenwashing policies and information overload. Here, in contrast to former literature reviews on IR, we provide new insights into this emerging research topic and concentrate on archival IR research. We are also interested in recent moderator- and mediator analysis in archival IR research since the business case argument for IR may require a specific environment, in addition to the main variables we have included. We likewise give a detailed overview of included variables and proxies and compare their main statistical effects. Our literature review demonstrates that (1) board composition and (2) stakeholder pressure positively influence IR quality; whereas (3) (non) financial performance leads to increased IR adoption and quality. We also find that both IR adoption and IR quality are linked with positive consequences on firm valuation, as they lead to higher total performance measures. Last but not least, this analysis includes useful recommendations for future IR research.
KW - Management studies
KW - integrated reporting
KW - corporate goverannce
KW - financial performance
KW - legitimacy theory
KW - stakeholder theory
KW - Archival research
KW - Sustainability Science
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85106493290&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/53f445a5-3c77-3311-b7d1-3aac99b49f18/
U2 - 10.1007/s10997-021-09582-w
DO - 10.1007/s10997-021-09582-w
M3 - Scientific review articles
AN - SCOPUS:85106493290
VL - 26
SP - 997
EP - 1061
JO - Journal of Management and Governance
JF - Journal of Management and Governance
SN - 1385-3457
IS - 3
ER -