A welfare analysis of the electricity transmission regulatory regime in Germany
Publikation: Arbeits- oder Diskussionspapiere und Berichte › Arbeits- oder Diskussionspapiere
Standard
Berlin: Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung (DIW), 2015. (DIW Discussion Papers; Nr. 1492).
Publikation: Arbeits- oder Diskussionspapiere und Berichte › Arbeits- oder Diskussionspapiere
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
T1 - A welfare analysis of the electricity transmission regulatory regime in Germany
AU - Kemfert, Claudia
AU - Kunz, Friedrich
AU - Rosellón, Juan
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - We analyze the current regulatory regime for electricity transmission in Germany, which combines network planning with both cost-plus and revenue-cap regulations. After reviewing international experiences on transmission investment, we first make a qualitative assessment of the overall German regime. The German TSOs have in general incentives to overinvest and inefficiently inflate costs. We further develop two models to analyze the transmission planning process. In the first model there is no trade-off between transmission expansion and generation dispatch. This is a modeling set-up similar to the one actually used in the German transmission planning (Netzentwicklungsplan). A second model alternatively allows for such a trade-off, and thus represents an optimal way of transmission network planning. Simulations with the two models are carried out and compared so as to illustrate the amount of excessive transmission capacity investment and welfare losses associated with the current regime.
AB - We analyze the current regulatory regime for electricity transmission in Germany, which combines network planning with both cost-plus and revenue-cap regulations. After reviewing international experiences on transmission investment, we first make a qualitative assessment of the overall German regime. The German TSOs have in general incentives to overinvest and inefficiently inflate costs. We further develop two models to analyze the transmission planning process. In the first model there is no trade-off between transmission expansion and generation dispatch. This is a modeling set-up similar to the one actually used in the German transmission planning (Netzentwicklungsplan). A second model alternatively allows for such a trade-off, and thus represents an optimal way of transmission network planning. Simulations with the two models are carried out and compared so as to illustrate the amount of excessive transmission capacity investment and welfare losses associated with the current regime.
KW - Economics
KW - transmission planning
KW - nodal prices
KW - congestion management
KW - electricity
KW - Germany
M3 - Working papers
T3 - DIW Discussion Papers
BT - A welfare analysis of the electricity transmission regulatory regime in Germany
PB - Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung (DIW)
CY - Berlin
ER -