School of Public Affairs

Organisational unit: Research School

Organisation profile

Leuphana School of Public Affairs is the academic and professional home to 1.000 bachelor’s, master’s and doctoral students and 31 professors. 30 research associates and 17 professional staff members are working for us.

The main themes of the school are reflected in its study programs: The School of Public Affairs is currently responsible for three Majors and four Minors at Leuphana College, five Master’s programmes and five Doctoral research groups at Leuphana Graduate School as well as five continuing education Master's programmes at Leuphana Professional School. As a novelty in Germany, the Master of Law offers students the opportunity to obtain both a Master's degree in law (LL.M.) as well as the state law examination. With its emphasis on "Law in Context", this model degree programme transcends a classic-dogmatic perspective of jurisprudence by presenting the relevant contents from civil law, public law and criminal law against the backdrop of current societal challenges and transformations. 

Main research areas

Leuphana School of Public Affairs brings together the disciplines of Political Science, Law, and Economics under one roof. With 31 professorships, it establishes an innovative profile in Germany on issues of public affairs, gaining both national and international visibility and academic reputation.

The School conducts research on the major transformations of our time and thus continues to develop its existing research agenda on the future of democracy, evidence-based political decision-making and law in the context of societal transformation. In an interdisciplinary collaborative endeavour, the three subjects will, among other things, answer pressing questions about

  • the legitimacy and performance of democracies, whose integrative power is under threat, especially in light of recent upheavals in politics and society,
  • the role of the state with regard to the relationship between private-law and public-law regulation,
  • the justification of governmental intervention into market processes and their ex-post evaluation.
  1. Published

    Betriebs- und Arbeitsplatzdynamik in wissensintensiven Industrien Niedersachsens (1995 - 2001)

    Wagner, J., 2003, Lüneburg: Institut für Volkswirtschaftslehre der Universität Lüneburg, 26 p. (Arbeitsbericht; no. 287).

    Research output: Working paperWorking papers

  2. Published

    Betriebs- und Arbeitsplatzdynamik in wissensintensiven Industrien Niedersachsens, 1995 bis 2001

    Wagner, J., 2003, In: Statistische Monatshefte Niedersachsen. 57, 4, p. 187-196 10 p.

    Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearch

  3. Published

    Between joint project, institutional bargaining and symbolic politics: initiatives for federalism reform in Germany, Austria and Switzerland

    Grotz, F. & Poier, K., 01.11.2012, In: Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft. 6, 2, Supplement, p. 77-101 25 p.

    Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

  4. Published

    Beweisbedürftigkeit, Beweisarten und Beweisverfahren

    Magnus, D., 2022, Das strafprozessuale Regelverfahren in erster Instanz. Kudlich, Hilgendorf & Valerius (eds.). 1 ed. Heidelberg: C.F. Müller, p. 991-1022 32 p. (Handbuch des Strafrechts; vol. 8).

    Research output: Contributions to collected editions/worksContributions to collected editions/anthologiesResearchpeer-review

  5. Published
  6. Published

    Beyond National Policymaking: Conceptions of Myth in Interpretive Policy Analysis and Their Value for IR

    Münch, S., 13.06.2016, Myth and Narrative in International Politics: Interpretive Approaches to the Study of IR. Bliesemann de Guevara, B. (ed.). London: Palgrave Macmillan, p. 47-66 20 p.

    Research output: Contributions to collected editions/worksChapterpeer-review

  7. Published
  8. Published
  9. Published

    BGH: Adressat der Übereignungsofferte bei Bereitstellung oder Ablieferung von Verpackungsabfällen

    Dornis, T. W., 2016, In: LMK : kommentierte BGH-Rechtsprechung. 1/2016, 2 p., 375503.

    Research output: Journal contributionsNotes on court decisionsResearch

  10. Published

    BGH: Keine Markenverletzung durch Keywood-Advertising bei deutlicher Trennung von Werbung und Suchtreffern

    Sturm, F., 2013, In: Computer und Recht: CR. 29, 1, p. R004-R005 2 p.

    Research output: Journal contributionsNotes on court decisionsEducation